Department of Environmental Conservation

D E C banner

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Small Businesses and Local Governments Summary Proposed Part 242

The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) is a cooperative, historic effort among New York and nine Participating States1 and is the first mandatory, market-based carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction program in the United States. Since its inception in 2008, RGGI has utilized a market-based mechanism to cap and cost-effectively reduce emissions that cause climate change. Recently, New York along with the Participating States, completed a comprehensive program review and announced a proposal to lower the regional emissions cap established under RGGI to approximately 75 million tons in 2021, declining 3.0 percent a year through 2030.2 Accordingly, New York and the Participating States committed to propose revisions, pursuant to state-specific regulatory processes, to their respective CO2 Budget Trading Programs to further reduce CO2 emissions from power plants in the region. To implement the updated RGGI program in New York State, the Department of Environmental Conservation (Department) proposes to revise 6 NYCRR Part 242, CO2 Budget Trading Program (the Program) and 6 NYCRR Part 200, General Provisions.

The only local governments affected by the proposed Program revisions are the Jamestown Board of Public Utilities (JBPU), which owns and operates the S. A. Carlson Generating Station (SACGS), and the Village of Freeport, which owns and operates the Freeport Power Plant No. 2. The emissions monitoring at both facilities currently meet the monitoring provisions of the proposed revisions. No additional monitoring costs will be incurred. The costs associated with their compliance with the proposed revisions will be similar to those incurred by other privately held sources. Their compliance costs in addition to those already incurred for compliance with the Program will depend upon their need to solicit professional services for compliance. No small businesses will be directly affected by the adoption of the proposed revisions.

The proposed Program revisions, capping regional CO2 emissions at approximately 75 million tons annually beginning in 2021, represent a nearly 30 percent reduction in the regional cap for the period 2020-2030. After 2021, the cap will decline by 2.275 million tons annually. The proposed revisions provide a Third Adjustment for Banked Allowances which will adjust the budget for 100 percent of the pre-2021 vintage allowances held by market participants as of the end of 2020, that are in excess of the total quantity of 2018, 2019 and 2020 emissions. This adjustment will be implemented over the period 2021-2025, after the actual size of the 2020 vintage private bank is determined.

The proposed Program revisions retain the Cost Containment Reserve (CCR) and modifies the CCR trigger price and the maximum amount of CCR allowances available at auction each year. CCR allowances will be triggered and released at auctions at $10.77 in 2020, at $13.00 in 2021 and will increase by seven percent each year thereafter. If the trigger price is reached, up to 10 million additional CCR allowances will be available for purchase at auction in 2020, increasing to up to 10 percent of the regional cap of additional CCR allowances beginning in 2021.

The proposed program revisions create an Emissions Containment Reserve (ECR), which will help secure additional emissions reductions by withholding allowances from auction if prices fall below established trigger prices. The states implementing the ECR will withhold up to 10 percent of their annual base budgets per year. The ECR trigger price will start at $6.00 in 2021 and will increase by seven percent each year thereafter.

The proposed Program revisions retain the interim compliance obligation.

Effect on Small Businesses and Local Governments

No small businesses will be directly affected by the adoption of the proposed Program revisions.

Compliance Requirements

As noted above, the JBPU and the Village of Freeport will need to comply with the proposed revisions to the Program, as described more fully in the Regulatory Impact Statement.

New York stakeholders raised concerns during our extensive outreach effort, that the cost of RGGI might result in increased operation at units not subject to the regulatory provisions of Part 242. To address this concern, New York is proposing to expand applicability under Part 242 to capture units that serve an electricity generator with a nameplate capacity equal to or greater than 15 megawatts (MW). that reside at an existing CO2 budget source, and to 15 MW units that reside at a facility where there are two or more units with a nameplate capacity of 15 MW or larger.

The proposed Program revisions retain the interim compliance obligation. In addition to demonstrating full compliance at the end of each three-year compliance period, regulated entities will continue to have to demonstrate that they are holding allowances equal to at least 50 percent of their emissions at the end of each of the first two years in each three-year compliance period. The proposed Program revisions also include minor revisions and updates to all references. The majority of the proceeds from the sale of New York's allowances will continue to be dedicated to strategic energy or consumer benefits, such as energy efficiency and clean energy technologies.

Professional Services

There are two local governments affected by the proposed revisions to the Program, the Jamestown Board of Public Utilities (JBPU) and the Village of Freeport, and like other privately held sources, they may need to solicit professional consultants and contractors for its compliance with the proposed revisions to the Program. The Department also confirmed that no capital improvements to plant operations will be needed for JBPU's or the Village of Freeport's compliance with the proposed Program revisions.

Costs

In addition to the costs identified for regulated parties and the public, State and local governments will incur costs. The Jamestown Board of Public Utilities (JBPU and the Village of Freeport own and operate affected facilities. Emissions monitoring at both facilities currently meets the monitoring provisions of the Program, and no additional monitoring costs will be incurred under the proposed revisions. Just like any other owner or operator of any source subject to the Program, the JBPU and the Village of Freeport will need to purchase CO2 allowances equal to the number of tons of CO2 emitted. The Department limited the analysis of control costs to the purchase of allowances to comply with the Program and assumed that the costs of allowances will be between $5.96 in 2020 and $9.77 in 2031 (in 2015 $) per ton for CO2 under the Program Case. To estimate total costs for SACGS under the Program, the Department reviewed 2013 through 2018 emissions from Jamestown's affected unit. During that time period, Jamestown's emissions ranged from a low of 71,255 tons to a high of 135,579 tons. An estimate of compliance costs, based on these emissions values, indicates that purchasing allowances to cover emissions will result in estimated costs between a low of $425,000 and a potential high of $1.3 million annually. To estimate total costs for Freeport Power Plant No. 2 under the Program, the Department reviewed 2013 through 2018 emissions from Freeport's affected unit. During that time period, Freeport's emissions ranged from a low of 23,662 tons to a high of 37,850 tons. An estimate of compliance costs, based on these emissions values, indicates that purchasing allowances to cover emissions will result in estimated costs between a low of $141,000 and a potential high of $369,795 annually. These costs will eventually be passed on to the consumers of electricity from the JBPU and the Village of Freeport. These estimated compliance costs are costs associated with compliance with the Program overall, meaning that the incremental cost of compliance associated with the revisions to the Program would be less.

The JBPU and the Village of Freeport have a range of compliance options to comply. Since the program has a three-year control period with the compliance obligation at the end of the control period, the emission peaks associated with electricity generation will be averaged out and more long-term planning options will be available to SACGS and Freeport Power Plant No. 2. Although the proposed Program revisions retain the Interim Control Period, that will require JBPU and the Village of Freeport to cover 50 percent of their emissions in each of the first two years of a three-year control period, it is not anticipated that this interim requirement will significantly reduce the flexibility available to JBPU and the Village of Freeport. The JBPU and the Village of Freeport will also incur costs associated with the administration of the revised Program.

Minimizing Adverse Impacts

The proposed revisions do not directly affect small businesses. Only two local governments are affected by the proposed. The proposed Program revisions constitute an emissions allowance-based cap-and-trade program. Cap and trade systems are the most cost-effective means for implementing emission reductions from large stationary sources. By continuing to implement the Program and proposed Program revisions, the Department will minimize any associated adverse economic impacts on the JBPU and the Village of Freeport.

Small Business and Local Government Participation

The Participating States initiated the most recent program review in the fall of 2015 and concluded the process in August 2017. The Participating States and RGGI Incorporated (RGGI, Inc.)3 conducted stakeholder meetings and webinars during this period, during which they obtained public input on a number of program elements. Prior to each stakeholder meeting, agency staff and RGGI, Inc. distributed pertinent material to the over 250 participants on the list serve and posted meeting documents on the RGGI, Inc. website. The stakeholder meetings were open to the public and all interested parties were encouraged to provide comment. The Draft Updated Model Rule was released to stakeholders for comment on August 23, 2017. On December 19, 2017, the Participating States released the final version of the Updated Model Rule, which contained additional updates based on stakeholder feedback received on the Draft Updated Model Rule.

New York conducted an in-state stakeholder process designed to provide updates on the status of the regional process and to afford additional opportunity for New York's stakeholders to provide comment. The Department held stakeholder meetings and sent list-serve notices to New York stakeholders announcing regional meetings and webinars. The input provided by stakeholders during both the regional and in-state processes have been considered and incorporated by the Department in developing the proposed revisions to the Program. The Department's records from those stakeholder meetings do not reflect that the JBPU or Freeport attended those meetings.

Cure Period of Ameliorative Action

The proposed Program revisions will be effective beginning in 2021. The revised Program will require affected sources already subject to the Program to continue to comply, and units newly subject to the emission limitations under the expansion of the Program to certain units 15 MW beginning in 2021. No additional cure period or other additional opportunity for ameliorative action is included in the Program revisions. First, aside from the proposed applicability expansion to certain units 15 MW or larger, most sources that will be subject to the proposed Program revisions are already subject to the existing Program and have been since the regulation was initially promulgated in 2008 (or since they commenced operation). This includes the SACGS and Freeport Power Plant No. 2. Second, because of the cap-and-invest nature of the revisions to the Program which includes periodic compliance deadlines, sources have flexibility to emit any amount of CO2 during a control period, provided such emissions are covered by an adequate amount of CO2 allowances by the relevant CO2 allowance transfer deadline. This is unchanged under the proposed revisions and will continue to provide sources with flexibility to comply with the proposed Program revisions. Finally, while the proposed Program revisions retain the interim compliance requirement, the first interim compliance period was in 2015 and subsequent interim compliance periods will continue to be each of the first two years of the three-year control period. For these reasons, no additional cure period or other additional opportunity for ameliorative action is necessary for the proposed Program revisions.

__________
1 In addition to New York, the RGGI Participating States include: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Additional states, including Pennsylvania and Virginia, have expressed interest in potentially becoming RGGI Participating States.
2 The Participating States released the Updated Model Rule on August 23, 2017.
3 RGGI, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation created to provide technical and administrative services to the Participating States.


  • Contact for this Page
  • NYSDEC
    Division of Air Resources
    Proposed Part 242
    625 Broadway
    Albany, NY 12233-3251
    518-402-8396
    Send us an email
  • This Page Covers
  • Page applies to all NYS regions