NY.gov Portal State Agency Listing Search all of NY.gov
D E C banner
D E C banner

Disclaimer

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has added a link to a translation service developed by Microsoft Inc., entitled Bing Translator, as a convenience to visitors to the DEC website who speak languages other than English.

Additional information can be found at DEC's Language Assistance Page.

Tubridy, Michael - Ruling 2, April 11, 2000

Ruling 2, April 11, 2000

STATE OF NEW YORK : DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

In the Matter of Alleged Violations of Articles
15 and 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law
and Parts 608 and 661 of Title 6 of the Official
Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the
State of New York by

MICHAEL TUBRIDY,
Respondent

Case No. R2-0428-99-03

RULING ON MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

April 11, 2000

At the hearing on March 7, 2000, counsel for the Department Staff moved to amend the complaint to include alleged violations at the time of site visists that occurred after the date of the motion for order without hearing. Counsel for the Respondent requested time to submit arguments in writing, opposing this motion. I set March 20, 2000 as the deadline for this correspondence.

I have received no correspondence from Mr. Mulvaney nor from Mr. Tubridy opposing the motion. On April 10, 2000, Assistant Regional Attorney Udo Drescher sent me an electronic mail message, with a copy by electronic mail to Mr. Mulvaney, inquiring about the status of the motion. I have received no response from Mr. Mulvaney as of this afternoon.

RULING: The motion to amend the complaint is granted.

The amendment of the complaint does not prejudice the Respondent since the Respondent has been aware of the Department Staff's additional site visits since at least March 7, 2000, as well as being aware of the motion to amend the complaint, and has time to prepare. In addition, there was testimony about the additional site visits at the hearing on March 7, in the context of the Department's civil penalty policy (specifically the question of cooperation in remedying the alleged violation) and the Respondent would not be surprised by testimony about these site visits. If the complaint were not amended, the Department Staff could serve an additional complaint regarding the additional site visits, but it appears to be more efficient to include these matters in the hearing which is already in progress.

/s/
Susan J. DuBois
Administrative Law Judge

Albany, New York
April 11, 2000

TO: Udo Drescher, Esq.
James E. Mulvaney, Esq.

  • PDF Help
  • For help with PDFs on this page, please call 518-402-9003.
  • Contact for this Page
  • Office of Hearings and Mediation Services
    NYS DEC
    625 Broadway, 1st Floor
    Albany, New York 12233-1550
    518-402-9003
    Send us an email
  • This Page Covers
  • Page applies to all NYS regions