Compressed Natural Gas and Clean Diesel Buses
Performance and Emissions Evaluation of Compressed Natural Gas and Clean Diesel Buses at New York City's Metropolitan Transit Authority
- Thomas Lanni, Brian P. Frank, Shida Tang, Division of Air Resources, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
- Deborah Rosenblatt, Environment Canada
- Dana Lowell, New York City Metropolitan Transit Authority
The New York City Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) has initiated a program to utilize various diesel emission control, alternative fuel, and hybrid electric drive technologies as part of its ongoing effort to provide environmentally friendly bus service. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has joined with the MTA and Environment Canada in evaluating this program, and has established a protocol for measuring both regulated and unregulated emissions, as well as other operational parameters. This paper compares and contrasts the emissions of buses powered by Detroit Diesel Series 50 diesel engines with and without continuously regenerating diesel particulate filters (CRDPFs), and by Series 50G Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) engines. All buses were tested for regulated emissions at the Emissions Research and Measurement Division of Environment Canada, in Ottawa, Ontario, and unregulated emissions measurements, including particle size distributions and chemical analysis, were supported by DEC staff.
CNG buses were generally found to produce more carbonyls, up to an order of magnitude higher than diesel buses. Greater than 96% of the total carbonyl emissions from CNG buses were formaldehyde, in contrast to 60-65% formaldehyde for the diesel buses. Reduction of carbonyls by the CRDPF was so efficient that most were below the method detection limit. Compared to CRDPF buses, higher emission of carbonyl, benzene, ethylene, propylene, toluene and PAHs from CNG buses without oxidation catalysts may contribute to the reported unfavorable toxic potentials from CNG buses. The reduction in PM of the CNG buses was approximately equal to that of the Series 50 CRDPF buses, i.e., a 90% reduction from Series 50 buses without CRDPF using 30 or 300 ppm sulfur fuel.
|Bus ID||Test Cycle||Config||Fuel||FE