Citizen Task Force Results

Region 3
Wildlife Mgmt. Unit	Counties involved*	Last Year TF met	Deer Population Desired by the Task Force	Buck Take Objective
3A	Ulster (Sullivan, Greene, Delaware)	1992	15% increase	3.0
3C	Ulster (Greene)	1997	10% decrease	2.7
3F	Dutchess	1993	30% decrease	2.4
3G	Dutchess	1998	15% decrease	4.1
3H	Sullivan (Ulster)	1996	5 to 10% increase	4.2
3J	Ulster	1994	10% decrease	3.4
3K	Sullivan (Orange)	1992	Maintain 1991 population level	3.5
3M	Orange (Ulster, Sullivan)	1998	15% decrease	3.3
3N	Putnam (Dutchess)	1992	15% decrease	2.7
3P	Orange (Rockland)	1993	25% decrease	2.5
3R	Rockland	Limited Access Unit
3S	Westchester	Archery only/Limited Access Unit

Region 4
Wildlife Mgmt. Unit	Counties involved*	Last Year TF met	Deer Population Desired by the Task Force	Buck Take Objective
4A	Montgomery (Schenectady, Schoharie, Albany)	1992	15% increase	1.9
4B	Albany, (Schenectady)	1995	35% decrease	1.2
4C	Rensselaer (Washington)	1995	5% increase	4.5
4F	Otsego (Schoharie, Delaware, Herkimer)	1990	7% increase	3.4
4G	Schoharie (Albany, Schenectady, Delaware)	2001	Maintain 1991 population level	2.3
4H	Albany (Schoharie)	1991	Maintain 1991 population level	3.4
4J	Albany	Archery only/Limited Access Unit
4K	Rensselaer	1994	15% decrease	3.0
4L	Rensselaer	1995	Maintain 1995 population level	2.0
4M	Rensselaer (Columbia)	2000	25% decrease	1.9
4N	Otsego	1992	Maintain Population	3.5
4O	Delaware (Broome, Chenango, Otsego)	1990	7% increase	3.3
4P	Delaware (Schoharie)	2002	15% decrease	2.7
4R	Greene (Schoharie)	2006	10% increase	2.0
4S	Greene (Albany)	1991	12% increase	3.3
4T	Columbia (Rensselaer)	1992	12% decrease	2.9
4U	Columbia (Rensselaer)			4.1
4W	Delaware (Sullivan, Ulster)	1991	3% increase	4.0
4Y	Columbia	1990	30% decrease	3.9
4Z	Columbia	1991	6% decrease	4.7

Region 5
Wildlife Mgmt. Unit	Counties involved*	Last Year TF met	Deer Population Desired by the Task Force	Buck Take Objective
5K	Washington (Rensselaer, Saratoga)	2004	Increase	2.8
5N	Washington (Rensselaer)	2004	10% increase	3.5
5P	Washington	2004	13% increase	3.4
5R	Saratoga (Schenectady)	2004	10% increase	1.3

Region 6
Wildlife Mgmt. Unit	Counties involved*	Last Year TF met	Deer Population Desired by the Task Force	Buck Take Objective
6A	St. Lawrence (Franklin, Jefferson)	1999	30% decrease	1.7
6C	St. Lawrence	2002	30% decrease	1.8
6G	Jefferson (Oswego)	1999	35% decrease	1.7
6H	Jefferson		CTF has not yet met
6K	Oneida (Oswego, Lewis,Jefferson)	1998	20% decrease	1.8
6P	Oneida	1991	No consensus; DEC will maintain 1991 population level	1.3
6R	(Herkimer, Montgomery, Fulton, Oneida, Saratoga, Schenectady)	1992	Maintain 1992 population level	0.7
6S	Oneida, Herkimer (Montgomery, Otsego, Madison, Schoharie)	1995	35% increase	2.5

Region 7
Wildlife Mgmt. Unit	Counties involved*	Last Year TF met	Deer Population Desired by the Task Force	Buck Take Objective
7A	Oswego (Cayuga, Onondaga)	2002	Maintain 1997 objective	1.8
7F	Onondaga, Cayuga, Madison, (Oswego, Oneida, Seneca)	2001	25% decrease	1.5
7H	Cayuga, Tompkins (Cortland, Onondaga)	2007	40% decrease	1.9
7J	Madison, Onondaga (Cayuga, Cortland, Chenango, Oneida)	2003	25% decrease	2.2
7M	Chenango, Cortland (Madison, Onondaga, Broome)	2006	10% decrease	2.5
7R	Tioga, Tompkins (Chemung, Schuyler, Cortland)	2004	35% decrease	2.7
7S	Broome Chenango, (Tioga)	2004	20% decrease	3.0

Region 8
Wildlife Mgmt. Unit	Counties involved*	Last Year TF met	Deer Population Desired by the Task Force	Buck Take Objective
8A	Orleans (Monroe, Niagara)	1990	4% decrease	1.5
8C	Monroe	1992	20 deer/sq. mi. of deer habitat
8F	Wayne (Cayuga, Monroe, Ontario)	1993	5% decrease	1.9
8G	Genesee (Erie, Monroe, Niagara, Orleans)	1993	Maintain 1990-92 average	2.3
8H	Livingston, Monroe, Ontario (Genesee, Wyoming)	1994	5% decrease	2.8
8J	Ontario, Seneca, Wayne	1994	No consensus, region will manage toward 3 year average	2.1
8M	Livingston (Wyoming, Steuben, Ontario)	1992	10% decrease	3.9
8N	Ontario, Yates, Livingston (Steuben)	CTF not yet scheduled
8P	Steuben (Yates, Ontario, Livingston)	1991	Maintain 1991 population level	4.2
8R	Yates (Schuyler, Steuben, Ontario)	1992	10% decrease	4.2
8S	(Schuyler, Seneca, Tompkins)	1992	20% increase	4.2
8T	Steuben	1997	11% increase	4.8
8W	Chemung, Schuyler, Steuben	1994	Maintain 1990-93 average	3.8
8X	Steuben (Allegany)	CTF not yet scheduled
8Y	Chemung (Steuben, Tioga)	1997	Maintain 1990 CTF Objective	4.5

Region 9
Wildlife Mgmt. Unit	Counties involved*	Last Year TF met	Deer Population Desired by the Task Force	Buck Take Objective
9A	Niagara (Erie)	2004	Maintain current objective	1.1
9F	Erie, Niagara	2003	22% decrease	2.5
9G	Erie, Chautauqua (Cattaraugus)	1998	Maintain 1997 population level	2.0
9H	Erie, Wyoming	2000	maintain 1999 pop. level	4.0
9J	Chautauqua	2004	Maintain current objective	3.5
9K	Chautauqua, Cattaraugus	1999	8% increase	4.0
9M	Cattaraugus	2002	21% decrease	5.1
9N	(Allegany, Cattaraugus, Wyoming)	2001	31% increase	3.5
9P	Allegany (Livingston, Steuben)	2003	12% decrease	6.0
9R	Cattaraugus (Chautauqua)	2001	9% decrease	4.1
9S	Cattaraugus	2000	21% decrease	3.1
9T	Cattaraugus	2004	Maintain current objective	4.4
9W	Cattaraugus, Allegany	2002	25% decrease	4.4
9X	Allegany, (Cattaraugus)	2003	4% decrease	5.8
9Y	Allegany	2002	35% decrease	5.0

*The majority of land in the wildlife management unit lies within the county or counties listed first. Counties listed in parentheses have smaller amounts of land in that unit. Wildlife management unit boundaries do not follow county lines.