Skip to main navigation
Citizen Task Force Results
Region 3
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 3A |
Ulster (Sullivan, Greene, Delaware) |
1992 |
15% increase |
3.0 |
| 3C |
Ulster (Greene) |
1997 |
10% decrease |
2.7 |
| 3F |
Dutchess |
1993 |
30% decrease |
2.4 |
| 3G |
Dutchess |
1998 |
15% decrease |
4.1 |
| 3H |
Sullivan (Ulster) |
1996 |
5 to 10% increase |
4.2 |
| 3J |
Ulster |
1994 |
10% decrease |
3.4 |
| 3K |
Sullivan (Orange) |
1992 |
Maintain 1991 population level |
3.5 |
| 3M |
Orange (Ulster, Sullivan) |
2008 |
17% decrease |
3.1 |
| 3N |
Putnam (Dutchess) |
1992 |
15% decrease |
2.7 |
| 3P |
Orange (Rockland) |
1993 |
25% decrease |
2.5 |
| 3R |
Rockland |
Limited Access Unit |
| 3S |
Westchester |
Archery only/Limited Access Unit |
Region 4
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 4A |
Montgomery (Schenectady, Schoharie, Albany) |
1992 |
15% increase |
1.9 |
| 4B |
Albany, (Schenectady) |
1995 |
35% decrease |
1.2 |
| 4C |
Rensselaer (Washington) |
1995 |
5% increase |
4.5 |
| 4F |
Otsego (Schoharie, Delaware, Herkimer) |
1990 |
7% increase |
3.4 |
| 4G |
Schoharie (Albany, Schenectady, Delaware) |
2001 |
Maintain 1991 population level |
2.3 |
| 4H |
Albany (Schoharie) |
1991 |
Maintain 1991 population level |
3.4 |
| 4J |
Albany |
Archery only/Limited Access Unit |
| 4K |
Rensselaer (Columbia) |
1994 |
15% decrease |
3.0 |
| 4L |
Rensselaer |
1995 |
Maintain 1995 population level |
2.0 |
| 4O |
Delaware (Broome, Chenango, Otsego) |
1990 |
7% increase |
3.3 |
| 4P |
Delaware (Schoharie) |
2002 |
15% decrease |
2.7 |
| 4R |
Greene (Schoharie) |
2006 |
10% increase |
2.0 |
| 4S |
Greene (Albany) |
1991 |
12% increase |
3.3 |
| 4T |
Columbia (Rensselaer) |
1992 |
12% decrease |
2.9 |
| 4U |
Columbia (Rensselaer) |
|
|
4.1 |
| 4W |
Delaware (Sullivan, Ulster) |
1991 |
3% increase |
4.0 |
| 4Y |
Columbia |
1990 |
30% decrease |
3.9 |
| 4Z |
Columbia |
1991 |
6% decrease |
4.7 |
Region 5
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 5R |
Saratoga (Schenectady) |
2009 |
No Change |
1.3 |
| 5S |
Washington (Rensselaer) |
2009 |
7% increase from 2008 level |
3.3 |
| 5T |
Washington (Saratoga) |
2009 |
25% increase from 2008 level |
2.8 |
Region 6
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 6A |
St. Lawrence (Franklin, Jefferson) |
1999 |
30% decrease |
1.7 |
| 6C |
St. Lawrence (Lewis, Jefferson) |
2002 |
30% decrease |
1.8 |
| 6G |
Jefferson (Oswego) |
1999 |
35% decrease |
1.7 |
| 6H |
Jefferson |
|
Primarily Fort Drum |
|
| 6K |
Oneida (Oswego, Lewis, Jefferson) |
1998 |
20% decrease |
1.8 |
| 6P |
Oneida |
1991 |
No consensus; DEC will maintain 1991 level |
1.3 |
| 6R |
(Herkimer, Montgomery, Fulton, Oneida, Saratoga, Schenectady) |
1992 |
Maintain 1992 population level |
0.7 |
| 6S |
Oneida, Herkimer (Montgomery, Otsego, Madison, Schoharie) |
1995 |
35% increase |
2.5 |
Region 7
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 7A |
Oswego (Cayuga, Onondaga) |
2009 |
Maintain 2009 population level |
2.1 |
| 7F |
Onondaga, Cayuga, Madison, (Oswego, Oneida, Seneca) |
2008 |
Maintain 2008 population |
1.9 |
| 7H |
Cayuga, Tompkins (Cortland, Onondaga) |
2007 |
40% decrease |
1.9 |
| 7J |
Madison, Onondaga (Cayuga, Cortland, Chenango, Oneida) |
2003 |
25% decrease |
2.2 |
| 7M |
Chenango, Cortland (Madison, Onondaga, Broome) |
2006 |
10% decrease |
2.5 |
| 7P |
Chenango, Broome |
|
New unit in 2009 |
|
| 7R |
Tioga, Tompkins (Chemung, Schuyler, Cortland) |
2009 |
Maintain current harvest intensity |
2.7 |
| 7S |
Broome, Tioga (Chemung) |
2004 |
20% decrease |
3.0 |
Region 8
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 8A |
Orleans (Monroe, Niagara) |
2009 |
15% decrease from 2009 level |
2.1 |
| 8C |
Monroe |
1992 |
20 deer/sq. mi. of deer habitat |
| 8F |
Wayne (Cayuga, Monroe, Ontario) |
2009 |
25% decrease from 2009 level |
2.0 |
| 8G |
Genesee (Erie, Monroe, Niagara, Orleans) |
1993 |
Maintain 1990-92 average |
2.3 |
| 8H |
Livingston, Monroe, Ontario (Genesee, Wyoming) |
1994 |
5% decrease |
2.8 |
| 8J |
Ontario, Seneca, Wayne |
1994 |
No consensus, region will manage toward 3 year average |
2.1 |
| 8M |
Livingston (Wyoming, Steuben, Ontario) |
1992 |
10% decrease |
3.9 |
| 8N |
Ontario, Yates, Livingston (Steuben) |
2008 |
10% decrease from 2008 level |
4.6 |
| 8P |
Steuben (Yates, Ontario, Livingston) |
1991 |
Maintain 1991 population level |
4.2 |
| 8R |
Yates (Schuyler, Steuben, Ontario) |
1992 |
10% decrease |
4.2 |
| 8S |
(Schuyler, Seneca, Tompkins) |
2009 |
3% decrease from 2009 level |
2.8 |
| 8T |
Steuben |
1997 |
11% increase |
4.8 |
| 8W |
Chemung, Schuyler, Steuben |
1994 |
Maintain 1990-93 average |
3.8 |
| 8X |
Steuben (Allegany) |
2008 |
12.5% decrease from 2008 level |
4.1 |
| 8Y |
Chemung (Steuben, Tioga) |
1997 |
Maintain 1990 CTF Objective |
4.5 |
Region 9
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 9A |
Niagara (Erie) |
2004 |
Maintain current objective |
1.1 |
| 9F |
Erie, Niagara |
2003 |
22% decrease |
2.5 |
| 9G |
Erie, Chautauqua (Cattaraugus) |
1998 |
Maintain 1997 population level |
2.0 |
| 9H |
Erie, Wyoming |
2000 |
maintain 1999 pop. level |
4.0 |
| 9J |
Chautauqua |
2004 |
Maintain current objective |
3.5 |
| 9K |
Chautauqua, Cattaraugus |
1999 |
8% increase |
4.0 |
| 9M |
Cattaraugus |
2002 |
21% decrease |
5.1 |
| 9N |
(Allegany, Cattaraugus, Wyoming) |
2001 |
31% increase |
3.5 |
| 9P |
Allegany (Livingston, Steuben) |
2003 |
12% decrease |
6.0 |
| 9R |
Cattaraugus (Chautauqua) |
2001 |
9% decrease |
4.1 |
| 9S |
Cattaraugus |
2000 |
21% decrease |
3.1 |
| 9T |
Cattaraugus |
2004 |
Maintain current objective |
4.4 |
| 9W |
Cattaraugus, Allegany |
2002 |
25% decrease |
4.4 |
| 9X |
Allegany, (Cattaraugus) |
2003 |
4% decrease |
5.8 |
| 9Y |
Allegany |
2002 |
35% decrease |
5.0 |
*The majority of land in the wildlife management unit lies within the county or counties listed first. Counties listed in parentheses have smaller amounts of land in that unit. Wildlife management unit boundaries do not follow county lines.