Skip to main navigation
Citizen Task Force Results
Region 3
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 3A |
Ulster (Sullivan, Greene, Delaware) |
1992 |
15% increase |
3.0 |
| 3C |
Ulster (Greene) |
1997 |
10% decrease |
2.7 |
| 3F |
Dutchess |
1993 |
30% decrease |
2.4 |
| 3G |
Dutchess |
1998 |
15% decrease |
4.1 |
| 3H |
Sullivan (Ulster) |
1996 |
5 to 10% increase |
4.2 |
| 3J |
Ulster |
1994 |
10% decrease |
3.4 |
| 3K |
Sullivan (Orange) |
1992 |
Maintain 1991 population level |
3.5 |
| 3M |
Orange (Ulster, Sullivan) |
1998 |
15% decrease |
3.3 |
| 3N |
Putnam (Dutchess) |
1992 |
15% decrease |
2.7 |
| 3P |
Orange (Rockland) |
1993 |
25% decrease |
2.5 |
| 3R |
Rockland |
Limited Access Unit |
| 3S |
Westchester |
Archery only/Limited Access Unit |
Region 4
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 4A |
Montgomery (Schenectady, Schoharie, Albany) |
1992 |
15% increase |
1.9 |
| 4B |
Albany, (Schenectady) |
1995 |
35% decrease |
1.2 |
| 4C |
Rensselaer (Washington) |
1995 |
5% increase |
4.5 |
| 4F |
Otsego (Schoharie, Delaware, Herkimer) |
1990 |
7% increase |
3.4 |
| 4G |
Schoharie (Albany, Schenectady, Delaware) |
2001 |
Maintain 1991 population level |
2.3 |
| 4H |
Albany (Schoharie) |
1991 |
Maintain 1991 population level |
3.4 |
| 4J |
Albany |
Archery only/Limited Access Unit |
| 4K |
Rensselaer |
1994 |
15% decrease |
3.0 |
| 4L |
Rensselaer |
1995 |
Maintain 1995 population level |
2.0 |
| 4M |
Rensselaer (Columbia) |
2000 |
25% decrease |
1.9 |
| 4N |
Otsego |
1992 |
Maintain Population |
3.5 |
| 4O |
Delaware (Broome, Chenango, Otsego) |
1990 |
7% increase |
3.3 |
| 4P |
Delaware (Schoharie) |
2002 |
15% decrease |
2.7 |
| 4R |
Greene (Schoharie) |
2006 |
10% increase |
2.0 |
| 4S |
Greene (Albany) |
1991 |
12% increase |
3.3 |
| 4T |
Columbia (Rensselaer) |
1992 |
12% decrease |
2.9 |
| 4U |
Columbia (Rensselaer) |
|
|
4.1 |
| 4W |
Delaware (Sullivan, Ulster) |
1991 |
3% increase |
4.0 |
| 4Y |
Columbia |
1990 |
30% decrease |
3.9 |
| 4Z |
Columbia |
1991 |
6% decrease |
4.7 |
Region 5
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 5K |
Washington (Rensselaer, Saratoga) |
2004 |
Increase |
2.8 |
| 5N |
Washington (Rensselaer) |
2004 |
10% increase |
3.5 |
| 5P |
Washington |
2004 |
13% increase |
3.4 |
| 5R |
Saratoga (Schenectady) |
2004 |
10% increase |
1.3 |
Region 6
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 6A |
St. Lawrence (Franklin, Jefferson) |
1999 |
30% decrease |
1.7 |
| 6C |
St. Lawrence |
2002 |
30% decrease |
1.8 |
| 6G |
Jefferson (Oswego) |
1999 |
35% decrease |
1.7 |
| 6H |
Jefferson |
|
CTF has not yet met |
|
| 6K |
Oneida (Oswego, Lewis,Jefferson) |
1998 |
20% decrease |
1.8 |
| 6P |
Oneida |
1991 |
No consensus; DEC will maintain 1991 population level |
1.3 |
| 6R |
(Herkimer, Montgomery, Fulton, Oneida, Saratoga, Schenectady) |
1992 |
Maintain 1992 population level |
0.7 |
| 6S |
Oneida, Herkimer (Montgomery, Otsego, Madison, Schoharie) |
1995 |
35% increase |
2.5 |
Region 7
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 7A |
Oswego (Cayuga, Onondaga) |
2002 |
Maintain 1997 objective |
1.8 |
| 7F |
Onondaga, Cayuga, Madison, (Oswego, Oneida, Seneca) |
2001 |
25% decrease |
1.5 |
| 7H |
Cayuga, Tompkins (Cortland, Onondaga) |
2007 |
40% decrease |
1.9 |
| 7J |
Madison, Onondaga (Cayuga, Cortland, Chenango, Oneida) |
2003 |
25% decrease |
2.2 |
| 7M |
Chenango, Cortland (Madison, Onondaga, Broome) |
2006 |
10% decrease |
2.5 |
| 7R |
Tioga, Tompkins (Chemung, Schuyler, Cortland) |
2004 |
35% decrease |
2.7 |
| 7S |
Broome Chenango, (Tioga) |
2004 |
20% decrease |
3.0 |
Region 8
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 8A |
Orleans (Monroe, Niagara) |
1990 |
4% decrease |
1.5 |
| 8C |
Monroe |
1992 |
20 deer/sq. mi. of deer habitat |
| 8F |
Wayne (Cayuga, Monroe, Ontario) |
1993 |
5% decrease |
1.9 |
| 8G |
Genesee (Erie, Monroe, Niagara, Orleans) |
1993 |
Maintain 1990-92 average |
2.3 |
| 8H |
Livingston, Monroe, Ontario (Genesee, Wyoming) |
1994 |
5% decrease |
2.8 |
| 8J |
Ontario, Seneca, Wayne |
1994 |
No consensus, region will manage toward 3 year average |
2.1 |
| 8M |
Livingston (Wyoming, Steuben, Ontario) |
1992 |
10% decrease |
3.9 |
| 8N |
Ontario, Yates, Livingston (Steuben) |
CTF not yet scheduled |
| 8P |
Steuben (Yates, Ontario, Livingston) |
1991 |
Maintain 1991 population level |
4.2 |
| 8R |
Yates (Schuyler, Steuben, Ontario) |
1992 |
10% decrease |
4.2 |
| 8S |
(Schuyler, Seneca, Tompkins) |
1992 |
20% increase |
4.2 |
| 8T |
Steuben |
1997 |
11% increase |
4.8 |
| 8W |
Chemung, Schuyler, Steuben |
1994 |
Maintain 1990-93 average |
3.8 |
| 8X |
Steuben (Allegany) |
CTF not yet scheduled |
| 8Y |
Chemung (Steuben, Tioga) |
1997 |
Maintain 1990 CTF Objective |
4.5 |
Region 9
| Wildlife Mgmt. Unit |
Counties involved* |
Last Year TF met |
Deer Population Desired by the Task Force |
Buck Take Objective |
| 9A |
Niagara (Erie) |
2004 |
Maintain current objective |
1.1 |
| 9F |
Erie, Niagara |
2003 |
22% decrease |
2.5 |
| 9G |
Erie, Chautauqua (Cattaraugus) |
1998 |
Maintain 1997 population level |
2.0 |
| 9H |
Erie, Wyoming |
2000 |
maintain 1999 pop. level |
4.0 |
| 9J |
Chautauqua |
2004 |
Maintain current objective |
3.5 |
| 9K |
Chautauqua, Cattaraugus |
1999 |
8% increase |
4.0 |
| 9M |
Cattaraugus |
2002 |
21% decrease |
5.1 |
| 9N |
(Allegany, Cattaraugus, Wyoming) |
2001 |
31% increase |
3.5 |
| 9P |
Allegany (Livingston, Steuben) |
2003 |
12% decrease |
6.0 |
| 9R |
Cattaraugus (Chautauqua) |
2001 |
9% decrease |
4.1 |
| 9S |
Cattaraugus |
2000 |
21% decrease |
3.1 |
| 9T |
Cattaraugus |
2004 |
Maintain current objective |
4.4 |
| 9W |
Cattaraugus, Allegany |
2002 |
25% decrease |
4.4 |
| 9X |
Allegany, (Cattaraugus) |
2003 |
4% decrease |
5.8 |
| 9Y |
Allegany |
2002 |
35% decrease |
5.0 |
*The majority of land in the wildlife management unit lies within the county or counties listed first. Counties listed in parentheses have smaller amounts of land in that unit. Wildlife management unit boundaries do not follow county lines.